Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program

Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program

PDF Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program Download

  • Author:
  • Publisher:
  • ISBN:
  • Category :
  • Languages : en
  • Pages : 814


Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle : DOD Guidance Needed to Protect Government's Interest

Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle : DOD Guidance Needed to Protect Government's Interest

PDF Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle : DOD Guidance Needed to Protect Government's Interest Download

  • Author: United States. General Accounting Office
  • Publisher:
  • ISBN:
  • Category : Artificial satellites
  • Languages : en
  • Pages : 36


Access to space issues associated with DOD's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on National Security, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives

Access to space issues associated with DOD's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on National Security, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives

PDF Access to space issues associated with DOD's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on National Security, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives Download

  • Author:
  • Publisher: DIANE Publishing
  • ISBN: 1428977287
  • Category :
  • Languages : en
  • Pages : 37


National Security Space Launch Report

National Security Space Launch Report

PDF National Security Space Launch Report Download

  • Author: Forrest McCartney
  • Publisher: Rand Corporation
  • ISBN: 0833039598
  • Category : Science
  • Languages : en
  • Pages : 82

In 1994, the National Space Transportation Policy laid the framework for appropriate government agencies to maintain strong launch systems and infrastructure while modernizing space transportation capabilities and encouraging cost reductions. More than a decade later, through combined Department of Defense (DoD) and industrial investment, the two Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) families of U.S. rockets (Atlas V and Delta IV) have proved to be maturing, reliable state-of-the-art technologies. In 2004, Congress directed the Secretary of Defense to establish a panel of experts with extensive space launch and operations background to address the future National Security Space launch requirements and the means of meeting those requirements. DoD selected RAND to facilitate and support this panel in its deliberations between May 2005 and May 2006. This report analyzes the National Security Space (NSS) Launch Requirements Panel's major findings and recommendations. In short, the Panel concludes that, because basic rocketry principles, use of chemically derived thrust, and multiple expendable stages seem certain to remain the design of choice for operational space launch vehicles, the EELV can satisfy all known and projected NSS requirements through 2020.


Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program

PDF Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program Download

  • Author:
  • Publisher:
  • ISBN:
  • Category :
  • Languages : en
  • Pages : 0

The EIS was prepared to analyze the potential environmental consequences of the Proposed Action and No-Action Alternative. The Proposed Action is the development, deployment, and operation of EELV systems. EELV systems would replace current Atlas 2A, Delta 2, and Titan 4B launch systems and are intended to meet the requirements of the U.S. Government National Executable Mission Model (NMM), both medium and heavy lift, at a lower launch cost than the present expendable launch systems. The launch locations for the program are Cape Canaveral Air Station, Brevard County, Florida, and Vandenberg Air Force Base, Santa Barbara County, California. Under the Proposed Action, three concepts were examined. Concepts A and B depict each of the two EELV contractor concepts. The number of launches analyzed for each concept includes the government NMM, plus 16 commercial launches per year. Under Concept A/B, it is assumed that both contractors would complete development and operate EELV systems. For the analysis, each contractor is assumed to launch 50 percent of the combined total of EELV flights. The No-Action Alternative would be a decision not to proceed with the EELV program and continue with Atlas 2A, Delta 2, and Titan 4B launches to meet the requirements of the NMM.


Defense space activities continuation of Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program's progress to date subject to some uncertainty.

Defense space activities continuation of Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program's progress to date subject to some uncertainty.

PDF Defense space activities continuation of Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program's progress to date subject to some uncertainty. Download

  • Author:
  • Publisher: DIANE Publishing
  • ISBN: 1428935371
  • Category :
  • Languages : en
  • Pages : 39


Space Acquisitions

Space Acquisitions

PDF Space Acquisitions Download

  • Author: Cristina Chaplain
  • Publisher: DIANE Publishing
  • ISBN: 1437910319
  • Category :
  • Languages : en
  • Pages : 40

The DoD plans to spend $27 billion acquiring launch services through the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program over the next 12 years. It uses 2 families of commercially owned and operated vehicles to launch satellites. The EELV program has undergone significant changes, including: adoption of a new acquisition strategy that sought to ensure the viability of the two EELV launch vehicle providers, Boeing and Lockheed Martin; the subsequent decision by those two co. to form a joint venture, the ULA; and a 10-year increase in the life of the program. This report: determines what uncertainties DoD faces in the EELV program and in the transition to ULA; and assesses how DoD is positioned to manage and oversee the effort. Illustrations.


The Air Force's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Competitive Procurement

The Air Force's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Competitive Procurement

PDF The Air Force's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Competitive Procurement Download

  • Author:
  • Publisher:
  • ISBN:
  • Category : Defense contracts
  • Languages : en
  • Pages : 46

While the previous two-contract structure of the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program met Department of Defense (DOD) needs for unprecedented mission success and an at-the-ready launch capability, the scope of its capability contract limited DOD's ability to identify the cost of an individual launch, as direct launch costs were not separated from other costs. Minimal insight into contractor cost or pricing data meant DOD may have lacked sufficient knowledge to negotiate fair and reasonable launch prices. Through DOD's development of a new acquisition strategy in 2011, and in preparation for contract negotiations with United Launch Alliance (ULA), DOD undertook significant efforts to obtain better contractor and subcontractor cost or pricing data. The December 2013 contract modification with ULA includes line items for both the fixed-price and cost-reimbursement portions funded under the previous two-contract structure, and DOD officials say the administrative burden of renegotiating new contracts every year will be substantially lessened due to the new contract's simplified structure. The new contract is also expected to provide DOD with a better understanding of individual launch costs than it had under previous contracts, as some costs are now directly attributable to specific launches. ULA periodically sells launch services to customers outside of the EELV program. Because DOD pays for ULA's fixed costs, DOD receives compensation for the use of ULA facilities on a per-launch basis for launches ULA sells to non-DOD customers. Under the new contract, compensation is based on some actual costs, and is approximately three times the dollar amount per-launch of reimbursements under previous contracts. If DOD requires all offers to contain both fixed-price and cost-reimbursement features for launch services and capability, respectively, similar to the way it currently contracts with ULA, there could be benefits to DOD and ULA, but potential burdens to new entrants. Alternatively, if DOD implements a fixed-price commercial approach to launch proposals, DOD could lose insight into contractor cost or pricing. DOD could also require a combination of elements from each of these approaches, or develop new contract requirements for this competition.


Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle

Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle

PDF Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Download

  • Author: Government Accountability Government Accountability Office
  • Publisher: CreateSpace
  • ISBN: 9781493520145
  • Category :
  • Languages : en
  • Pages : 34

DOD began the EELV program in 1995 to provide a new generation of launch vehicles to ensure affordable access to space for government satellites. It resulted in two families of commercially owned and operated launch vehicles Boeing's Delta IV and Lockheed Martin's Atlas V.


EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE: DoD Guidance Needed to Protect Government's Interest

EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE: DoD Guidance Needed to Protect Government's Interest

PDF EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE: DoD Guidance Needed to Protect Government's Interest Download

  • Author:
  • Publisher:
  • ISBN:
  • Category :
  • Languages : en
  • Pages : 0

The primary purpose of the Department of Defense's (DOD) Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program is to develop a family of vehicles that will (1) reduce the costs of launching satellites into space and (2) at a minimum, maintain the reliability, operability, and capability levels of current launch systems. As you requested, we reviewed the EELV program, with emphasis on DOD's revised acquisition approach. We specifically reviewed whether (1) DOD's goal of reducing recurring space launch costs could be achieved, (2) DOD'S planned investment would result in commensurate benefits, and (3) there are risks that could affect the program.